NUMA

Solid

Thumbnail of the map 'Solid'

Hover over the thumbnail for a full-size version.

Author walrus_of_death
Tags action author:walrus_of_death bitesized featured playable rated
Created 2007-05-26
Rating
4
by 23 people.
Map Data

Description 5

This map was featured on 2010-08-02

For about three years now I have been trying recreate this map from memory. My product never gets the outcome of the perfectly spaced z snapped mines or the gameplay that walrus_of_death was able to achieve here. For three years I have yet to be able to make a map that comes close to this one. When I sit down to make a map, especially when i don’t have an idea already, it’s this map that is the back of my head when I start out. Of course something different always results. Pretty good for a three year old map. — cucumber_boy

Other maps by this author

Thumbnail of the map 'Your ego is dead.' Thumbnail of the map 'Hysteria' Thumbnail of the map 'Godless' Thumbnail of the map 'Mohammed' Thumbnail of the map 'Nietzsche' Thumbnail of the map 'Country Leaver'
Your ego is dead. Hysteria Godless Mohammed Nietzsche Country Leaver

Comments

Pages: (0)

thedupli's avvie was awesome

If we had .5 ratings 2.5 would be average. 3 is still above average.

@Maxson

Yes, same.

Nice map

for such a simple tileset. One real enemy and plenty of challenge. The last bit is a doozy. It took me a ton of attempts.
AGD
Demo Data

@ mahi:

"i hate the excuse of "3 being above average". we all know that's not true. we do not give maps we think are "above average" threes. we give them fours. i think we can be unanimous there."

Nope. We cannot be unanimous there. I give maps I find above average a 3, because that's what you're supposed to do. I definitely give out more 3's and 2's than 4's.
Everything these days is about stylistic flair, isn't it? As long is it looks PALEMOON-esque or some other bullcrap it's all "ZOMG 5/5". I've seen maps that are nearly impossible to beat (and in a frustrating way) get high rates due to good looks. I'd understand it if it were just a tileset or an N-art, but on an actual map, gameplay is at least 47 times more important than looks. Also, the new tiles don't mix well with the gameplay. the make the level less crisp from a playing viewpoint. Why slide off of some slanty stuff if it just leads to frustration?

lets be clear

i hate the excuse of "3 being above average". we all know that's not true. we do not give maps we think are "above average" threes. we give them fours. i think we can be unanimous there.
doesn't make me wrong or you right. Your version of this map was worse than the original. I can dislike your tastes in maps and still objectively think that map you made wasn't as good as this one.

@Maximo

No need to be a *******.. Just because we got off on a bad start does not mean you need to automatically just start hating every one my tastes or ideas. You may have good maps but that does not define you as a person.

Also, I believe I posted this before:
Atob
I gave you a three.
A three is fine. A three is above average.

This map isn't great, imo, a 4 = great. That's just my opinion, and what you leave yourself open to when you put a map up for voting.
and say my complaints and approvals. Thanks guys. :D

Dear God Ferox

That is ugly. That map is strictly worse than this map. Even just 1 death because you cut a 6 tile into the flat wall is enough to ruin this map. You just went and put gameplay 2nd. This is exactly what is wrong with most new maps. How come a map of just e tiles can't be a good map? Even if they are all in straight lines? Gameplay>aesthetics. This map has great flow and is well crafted. Don't assume just because you go and add a bunch of useless tiles to the map you somehow improved it because you think it's "nicer" to look at. That is completely wrong, it only looks nicer because current mapping standards dictate you spend 45 minutes perfecting the tileset that players can't even reach and 2 minutes playtesting instead of the other way around. Ugh, I can't believe you actually tried to say that was an improvement to this map.

TL;DR: God Ferox, that was not an improvement at all.

...

It's not that hard...
Demo Data

This is a very fun map. I'd say a good pick!
came back to play this when I saw it featured, realized I'd forgotten to rate it five like that ancient comment of mine said.. nowadays I'd probably place a map like this one at about 4/5 and that might be generous, who knows, subjective Nyway aint it?! anyways just rated 5. said I would, aeons ago.

TL;DR:
I leik ur m4p
Demo Data

AGD

Harder than it looks. Lots of fun and therefore, replay value.
Demo Data

IMO,

it feels and plays like an extremely generic legacy map with some nice mines. 3

Fun

but disliked the bottom right mine/trap door setup, very cramped.

this is really nice

surprising how old it is

Little Faster AGD

For me...
Demo Data

actually, this was terribly dull

07 was still ace

vankusss

that run was sick.

insane fucking good map. 4/5.

agd

few close calls :P
Demo Data

'07 was ace

disliked it

bad aesthetics especially. and yes, i know this was accepted in '07, but i don't think the "perfectly z-snapped mines" needed to be highlighted in the review; they're not overly attractive.

Casual AGD

This gets 3 bottles of awesomesauce out of 2.
Demo Data

AGD

This plays very well. And yes, all the mines are c-snapped.
Demo Data
they look c snapped, you can clearly see the lines there. Just saying.

Pretty great

Yes.
I'm usually pretty cool towards rocket-based maps, but this one was fun.
Demo Data

slow all gold demo

I agree with you fully. 5aved.
Demo Data

sub 900 AGD

Demo Data

...

Speechless...

4.5/5

5avedsized

This map kicks ass!

Faster AGD

sub 900 is possible
Demo Data

faster agd

4/5
Demo Data

Faster AGD

Faster
Demo Data

AGD

One of the simplest and most fun maps I have ever created.
Demo Data