Small and thoughtful is fine. Nothing wrong with images in general.

I should have said the main problem was they were just too large.

Half the size and they would have been coolnosweat!

I imagine Slick's images were the most crass and obnoxious sort of advertising possible.

and say that I don't see anything more wrong with images than text in a description, so long as it isn't too big. I think it's cool, really. Like, so what if it's an obvious cry for attention? Isn't that what doing anything at all with the description is already? Don't be mad at the television just because you only advertise through radio.

Thank you. I've told solitude as well.

They stretch the Hot Maps page. Please do not post images in your map description unless they're relevant.

obvious ploys to attract that add absolutely nothing to the value of the map itself.

are rather obnoxious.