Squid
Author | rule |
---|---|
Tags | author:rule featured n-art non-playable rated tha-squid-v1 |
Created | 2008-11-05 |
Last Modified | 2009-08-24 |
Rating |
4 by 130 people.
|
Map Data | |
Description | Teehee! RCE! ^^
25 hours on top. Dronies nomination, Yay! Rz |
This map was featured on 2008-12-03
When you think of rule, you think of a lot of things, such as action maps, terrific tilesets, awesomeness, great gold placement, and banana, among other things. However, rule has surprised everyone with a fantastic, funny, and unique creation. "Tha Squid v1" is a perfect example of what n-arts are supposed to be. Now I know there are plenty of people that would completely disagree with me, but if you take the time to look and see how much effort and care that has actually been put into this, you would understand my point. Bravo! — tinkers7777
Other maps by this author
Comments
2010-01-17
Nice N-Art
Nothing spectacular, but well done. :)
2009-08-25
Nice one.
I think I've seen this before(or something like this), but the other person used a magnifying glass and a plank of wood.
Your art is pretty good. i Like. =D
U should look at my things also.
I am coming back with only one more map and I'm moving on with my life.
XD
My maps take way too long to make.
And ban-ball is much more fun to make map-art in.
Your art is pretty good. i Like. =D
U should look at my things also.
I am coming back with only one more map and I'm moving on with my life.
XD
My maps take way too long to make.
And ban-ball is much more fun to make map-art in.
2009-03-07
why did you put a smile face after nope
thats a bad thing.
cause i want it finished.
hey i havent voted yet!!!
5
cause i want it finished.
hey i havent voted yet!!!
5
But this one seems to be more charismatic. Number of ratings doesnt discern which is better imo, seeing, as that's a largely random number most of the time.
2008-12-20
Wow, Ive just realised
This is bad compared to Tha Elephant.
2008-12-11
Woah.
Amazing. You can see the detail he put into it. It looks really 3D and it doesn't look pixellated at all. In fact, it looks like it was a painting that he put on NUMA. 5aved.
2008-12-04
So are you thinking
of doing a V2?
2008-12-04
sorry, this is the link
http://nmaps.net/147841
2008-12-04
As ionman asked,
I made a DDA out of it.
http://nmaps.net/browse
Now it should get instant 5's for being DDA !AND! n-art.
Sweeeeeeeeeeeet
http://nmaps.net/browse
Now it should get instant 5's for being DDA !AND! n-art.
Sweeeeeeeeeeeet
2008-12-04
MGS4 is a straight to blu-ray movie
jokes, jokes :)
2008-12-04
ps3 rox
mgs4 > big library > wacky remotes
2008-12-04
5/5
Very artistical
2008-12-04
...
"This map is awesome 5aved."
2008-12-03
wouldnt...
it be awesome if someone could make a dda out of this???
2008-12-03
ENOUGH
Please.
All further comments on this map that perpetuate these petty little arguments will be deleted.
Hang it up people.
All further comments on this map that perpetuate these petty little arguments will be deleted.
Hang it up people.
2008-12-03
i played it
it wasnt very good.
2008-12-03
Don't forget to Vote in the Dronies!
D:<
2008-12-03
Here here!
2008-12-03
The featured list
is for anything the reviewer sees fit to highlight. Regardless of how old it is, or how much attention it's already received.
One of the reasons I allowed tinkers the position is because his view of what makes a worthy map differs greatly from the views of the reviewers already on the roster, and it certainly has added a little extra colour...
Personally, I'm not a fan of Narts being featured, but it's not my place to discriminate or dictate in that regard, and neither is it anyone else's.
Leave the reviewers be. If you think you can do better, apply for a position yourselves. Or in the case of the inactive reviewers who are complaining on this page perhaps even step up like you should be doing and show others by example what a great map can be rather than cramming it down their throats.
One of the reasons I allowed tinkers the position is because his view of what makes a worthy map differs greatly from the views of the reviewers already on the roster, and it certainly has added a little extra colour...
Personally, I'm not a fan of Narts being featured, but it's not my place to discriminate or dictate in that regard, and neither is it anyone else's.
Leave the reviewers be. If you think you can do better, apply for a position yourselves. Or in the case of the inactive reviewers who are complaining on this page perhaps even step up like you should be doing and show others by example what a great map can be rather than cramming it down their throats.
2008-12-03
Because
I didn't want to upset him. Man, I should've carried on, I rather enjoyed it.
2008-12-03
Why the heck
did the farman back down purely because rule threw a hissy fit? I wish people did that when I threw them.
"I'm cranky, with a bad case of bigheadedness, accept my views!"
"I'm cranky, with a bad case of bigheadedness, accept my views!"
2008-12-03
Wait, what?
featuring isn't an archive of the best maps
The original intention was something like a hall of fame... so, you may be a little off there. Obviously not ALL the best maps are here, as TCM still hasnt been featured. Still, my point is valid.
2008-12-03
No one knows
Its the curse of rule :)
2008-12-03
On a rather un-related note
Why isn't your profile working?
2008-12-03
Look
All I'm saying is that I don't think this should be featured, and that it was rather foolish of tinkers to review it. I'm not saying it's bad or anything, just it got a load of attention lavished on it when it came out, the description says that for itself. Maybe I overreacted a bit, and it was rather immature of me to post that, but I was angry that such a popular map was featured, featuring isn't an archive of the best maps, it's an archive of maps that the reviewer finds to be special. This is not special, plenty have been done before. Sorry to overreact, but can you see my point?
2008-12-03
toefacekiller is the winner this comment
try again next comment you guys :)
thereisaspoon
216th